From the monthly archives:

July 2009

Prior to World War II, venture capital was primarily the domain of wealthy investors and families. In 1958, the government passed the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 which allowed the Small Business Administration to license private small business investment companies (SBICs) to spur entrepreneurial activity.

Government officials felt there was a gap in capital markets for funding growth-oriented small businesses. In addition, the government wanted to stimulate technological advances to compete against progress in the Soviet Union. The Act enabled small investment firms to access federal funds which could be leveraged up to 4:1 against privately raised funds.

In 1946, Georges Doriot, a former dean of Harvard Business School, founded the American Research and Development Corporation (ARDC) with Ralph Flanders and Karl Compton (former president of MIT). Its goal was to encourage private sector investments in businesses run by soldiers who were returning from World War II. ARDC was significant because it was the first institutional private equity investment firm that raised capital from sources other than wealthy families. Among its early success stories was a $70,000 investment in Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) which would be valued at over $355 million after the company’s initial public offering in 1968. Former employees of ARDC went on to found other prominent venture capital firms.

The DEC investment was a precursor to the explosive growth of venture capital in Silicon Valley, California, in the 1960s and onward. Venture capital firms based in Menlo Park, California, such as Kleiner, Perkins, Caufield & Byers and Sequoia Capital, focused their attention on breakthrough technologies in electronics, medical technology and data-processing. Venture capital came to be almost synonymous with high tech. It served to launch many familiar brand names, including Apple, Cisco, Compaq, Electronic Arts, Federal Express, Genentech and others.

The highly public success of the venture capital industry in California in the 1970s spawned a proliferation of other firms. By the end of the 1980s, there were more than 650 venture capital firms managing over $31 billion in capital. However, by the end of the decade, venture capital returns started to drop, due to increased competition for hot startups, too many IPOs, and foreign competition. Through the first half of the 1990s, firms focused on improving operations in their portfolio companies.

We are all familiar with what happened next. Venture capital exploded in the late 1990s as investors showed a huge surge of interest in rising Internet businesses and other computer companies. IPOs for dot-com companies with little more than a website and a business plan reaped huge sums of money for venture capitalists and early investors. Among the high profile start-ups making the headlines were Amazon.com, e-Bay, Intuit, Netscape, Sun Microsystems and Yahoo! Some of the biggest dot-com ventures to crash and burn included pets.com, eToys and Webvan, a company proposing to deliver groceries via online ordering.

When the Nasdaq bubble that had been supporting many of these companies finally burst in 2000, it took the venture capital industry down with it. Many VC firms had to write off huge chunks of their investments. Many others closed their doors. By mid-2003, the venture capital industry had shrunk to roughly half its 2001 capacity.

The success of some Internet based businesses such as Google.com and Salesforce.com have helped revive the industry, though it remains a small portion of the overall private equity market and has not come close to matching its mid-1990s levels of investment. In 2008, the industry was managing roughly $28 billion in capital, according to the National Venture Capital Association.

The financial crises that began in 2007 has put a further damper on VC activity, drying up new sources of capital and all but slamming the door on the market for initial public offerings, a popular exit strategy for VCs. Many portfolio companies have had to put their IPO plans on hold, or to rely on sales to strategic buyers for an exit from their investment.

The increasingly international nature of start-ups has put further pressure on VC firms. Whereas in the early years, the competition was between Silicon Valley and perhaps Boston’s Route 128 region, today it’s just as likely to be in Shanghai or Bangalore. Venture capital today requires a global strategy.

References:

Forbes.com

Harvard Business School   www.hbs.edu
 

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Private equity investing can be traced back to the industrial revolution when merchant banks in Europe and later, the U.S., financed industrial projects and the building of the Transcontinental Railroad.

When J. Pierpont Morgan bought Andrew Carnegie’s American Steel Company in 1901, it marked one of the earliest known major corporate buyouts. J.P. Morgan would later finance railroads and other industrial ventures.

Private equity in the early part of the 20th century was largely practiced by wealthy individuals and families such as the Vanderbilts, Whitneys, Rockefellers and Warburgs. Laurance Rockefeller helped finance the creation of Eastern Airlines and his family developed vast holdings in a variety of companies and real estate.

The period after World War II was characterized by relatively modest volumes of private equity investment. In the 1960s, private equity firms organized into the structure that is common today, limited partnerships, in which investment professionals serve as general partners and the investors, as passive limited partners, provide the capital. Firms began using the now familiar “2 and 20″ compensation structure, with limited partners paying an annual management fee of up to 2 percent and 20 percent of profits to the general partners.

In the late 1970s and 1980s, the industry experienced the first of three boom cycles. Financier Michael Milken popularized the use of high yield debt (also known as junk bonds) in corporate finance and mergers and acquisitions. This fueled a boom in leverage buyouts and hostile takeovers.

Milken’s network of high-yield bond buyers enabled him to raise large sums of money which provided the fuel for entrepreneurs such as John Malone’s Tele-Communications Inc., Ted Turner’s budding 24-hour TV network, Turner Broadcasting, cellphone pioneer Craig McCaw, and casino entrepreneur Steve Wynn.

By some estimates, there were more than 2,000 leveraged buyouts during this period. Other well-known corporate raiders during the 1980s included Carl Icahn, Victor Posner, Nelson Peltz, Robert M. Bass, T. Boone Pickens, Harold Clark Simmons, Kirk Kerkorian, Sir James Goldsmith, Saul Steinberg and Asher Edelman.

Milken’s money-raising ability also facilitated the activities of leveraged buyout (LBO) firms such as Kohlberg Kravis Roberts. Led by three former Bear Stearns executives, KKR targeted successful family-owned businesses founded after World War II that were facing succession challenges.

Many of these buyouts would sell off pieces of the company to pay off the debt load. Thus, leveraged buyouts came to symbolize “ruthless capitalism” prompting a backlash in the media and Oliver Stone’s famous movie, Wall Street. The era culminated in the massive $31.1 billion dollar takeover of RJR Nabisco by KKR, which was later popularized by the book, Barbarians at the Gate. The junk bond industry collapsed later in the decade in part due to Milken’s 1989 indictment and 1990 guilty plea to multiple charges that he violated US securities laws.

The industry enjoyed another boom cycle from 1992 to 2000 with the emergence of more institutionalized private equity firms and the high tech frenzy among telecommunications and Internet companies. This cycle ended with the Dot-com crash of 2002.

When the dust settled from that crisis, historically low interest rates geared to jump-starting the economy spawned a wave of leveraged buyouts from 2003 through 2007. It led to the completion of 13 of the 15 largest leveraged buyouts in history, a major expansion in private equity activity, and the growth of massive, institutional-sized private equity firms such as The Blackstone Group and the Carlyle Group.

Sarbanes Oxley legislation, passed in the wake of the corporate accounting scandals at Enron, Worldcom, Tyco, Global Crossing and other companies also added an extra layer of cost and complexity to publicly-traded companies. Thus, many top executives saw private equity ownership as more attractive than remaining public.

Leveraged buyouts were back, only this time private equity executives rebranded themselves as pursuers of corporate efficiency and of “adding value” to underperforming companies. Major buyouts were once again common from 2004 through 2006 due to widely available credit at unprecedented levels of leverage.

By 2007, however, the crisis that affected the mortgage market spilled over into the world of leveraged finance. By mid year, there was a clear slowdown in high yield and leverage loan markets with far fewer issuers. Uncertain market conditions continued to put a damper on investment, with many firms withdrew from or renegotiated deals completed at the top of the market. The LBO market ground to a halt..

The credit crunch has prompted private equity firms to either sit tight on their investments or pursue other ways of deploying their funds. This includes Private Investments in Public Equity (PIPE) transactions.

In addition, several of the largest private equity firms have pursued opportunities through the public markets. In 2006, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts raised $5 billion in an initial public offering for a new permanent investment vehicle (KKR Private Equity Investors or KPE). The Blackstone Group completed its first major IPO of a private equity firm in June 2007. These public offerings allow investors who would otherwise be unable to invest in a traditional private equity limited partnership to gain exposure to a portfolio of private equity investments.

According to the Wharton School of Business and their 2009 Wharton Private Equity & Venture Capital Conference, Private equity firms will face unprecedented challenges in the next few years. Deals that once required only 15% in equity will require upwards of 35 to 40 percent or more. In addition, many private equity firms face a “wall” of refinancings that are due in 2012 which may challenge the survival of both the portfolio companies and many established private equity firms.

Next time, we’ll look at a brief history of the venture capital industry.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The venture capital world is comprised of a few hundred small firms, usually structured as partnerships and employing between 2 and 50 people. They are lean and flat organizations, dedicated to the entrepreneurial culture and usually focused on a particular industry niche such as technology, biotech, or more recently, clean technologies.

Venture capitalists enjoy a high degree of job satisfaction, working with very smart, passionate people who try to turn their brilliant ideas into a business success story. Venture capitalists help fund these potential high growth companies and help them make critical business decisions to hopefully develop the next Yahoo, Intel, FedEx or Apple.

However, as a well-known venture capitalist and evangelist Guy Kawasaki says, venture capital is a job you choose at the end of your career, not the beginning. When you’re young, he feels you should work 80 to 100 hours a week creating a product or service that changes the world. Not sit around a boardroom table listening to someone else explain why their idea is revolutionary.

That’s why venture capital firms generally seek out seasoned veterans, scientists and executives with deep experience in a particular industry. Very few MBA grads manage to get their foot in the door (winning a Kaufman Fellowship is one way). Other junior hires get snapped up from the top businesses schools such as Harvard or Stanford or through personal contacts and networking.

Those with entrepreneurial and operating experience are more likely to be hired. However, these types will be accustomed to hands-on involvement managing a company, and will have to get used to sitting back and working to keep the deal flow coming into the firm rather than getting involved running a company on a day-to-day basis.

In fact, according to some VC insiders, the average firm reviews close to 2,000 potential deal proposals each year. That means if you are an associate at the firm, you’ll personally have to analyze between 50 to 100 proposals per week. You’ll have to sift through the pitches that don’t match your firm’s focus, uncover the few decent ones, interview the entrepreneurs and possibly invite them in for a pitch. The flip side is, by constantly reviewing so many opportunities, you’ll get a broad overview of trends and changes in your particular industry of interest.

It might take several years for a venture capitalist to get wealthy, but they can make large amounts of money with less risk and burnout than the entrepreneurs that they fund. The average total compensation, industry-wide, for venture capitalists was $255,000 USD, according to the 2008 Job Search Digest Private Equity and VC Compensation Report.

The Holy Grail for a venture capitalist is to see one of the firm’s investments take off and become a billion-dollar success story. You are on the ground floor to profit financially as well as enjoy the satisfaction of knowing that some of your decisions and suggestions played a key role in getting the business to this stage.

References:

http://blog.guykawasaki.com

http://technosailor.com

www.bankersball.com

www.wetfeet.com

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Private Equity Job Culture

July 20, 2009

The top private equity firms tend to have what Bain & Company calls a “performance culture,” meaning managers and employees are determined to do everything possible to increase the value of the companies in which they invest.
Nothing is allowed to get in the way of making their portfolio companies more profitable and valuable. Thus, a [...]

Read the full article →

Tools to Helps Your Venture Capital Job Search

July 15, 2009

ONLINE RESOURCES
VentureBeat.com
Founder Matt Marshall covered venture capital for the San Jose Mercury News until he left in Sept. 2006 to launch VentureBeat as an independent company. In 2008, the New York Times called VentureBeat one of the “best blogs on the Web,” and now the NYT runs VentureBeat’s articles on its Web site.
http://www.venturebeat.com/
TheFunded.com is an [...]

Read the full article →

Tools to Help Your Private Equity Job Search

July 13, 2009

ONLINE RESOURCES
Reuters Buyouts
A source of news, data, analysis and interpretation of trends in the private equity industry. Delivered to their subscribers bi-monthly, every issue has reports on new funds and fund closes, deals, exits, general partners, limited partners, deal makers, intermediaries and more. They also publish Private Equity Week, which provides weekly coverage of the [...]

Read the full article →

Working with Venture Capital Recruiters

July 8, 2009

Many of the same principles for working with private equity recruiters apply in the venture capital world. Develop relationships with 1-2 top recruiters … understand that they have the hiring firm’s best interests in mind … treat recruiters as an important information resource … and always be courteous and professional with them.
However, given the relatively [...]

Read the full article →

Working with Private Equity Recruiters

July 6, 2009

If you want to improve your chances of landing a private equity job or moving to a better position, then sooner or later you may with executive recruiters.
Recruiters who target the private equity industry have extensive networks and often have access to jobs you may not hear about otherwise. However, there are a few ground [...]

Read the full article →

Networking for a Venture Capital Job

July 1, 2009

More than most industries, in venture capital, it’s who you know that counts. So building your personal network is absolutely crucial to landing a venture capital job interview.
There are a number of strategies that can help you get started. Start with your own personal contacts, family, friends and classmates who may know someone who knows [...]

Read the full article →