Private Equity Employment and Interest Rates

January 28, 2013

As everyone knows, interest rates matter, and, depending upon the sector of the financial industry, interest rates matter a lot.  With the Federal Reserve recently adopting the “Evans Rule”, which effectively states that monetary policy will remain unchanged until inflation expectations rise above 2.5 percent and/or the unemployment rate drops below 6.5 percent, one might ask: what kind of an effect (the effect is felt through interest rate policy) could this have on the financial industry, and in particular, on the private equity industry.

The question is at least partially answered by empirically looking at how sensitive employment in private equity businesses, hedge fund firms, and investment banking firms is to the Federal Reserve’s effective federal funds rate and the long term Treasury interest rates.   The results are as follows.

Starting first with the private equity industry, the results show a moderately statistically significant (weak at best) effect of the effective federal funds target rate on overall industry employment, with an estimated effect of 0.008441 and a confidence level of 75.2 percent.

What does the 0.008441 mean?  It means that about 75 percent of the time, when the federal funds target rate increases by 100 basis points, we would expect private equity employment to increase by about 8 people.  This is the increase that is independent of U.S. employment growth and the other factors included in the regression model.

Interestingly, there’s little to no confidence that the 10 year note has any effect on private equity industry employment, with an estimated confidence level of 25.7 percent.

Private Equity
Estimated Effect on Private Equity Employment Confidence Level
Employment (U.S.) 0.000017 23.3%
Capital Gains Tax Rate -0.907100 95.0%
Ten year  Treasury 0.004433 25.7%
Effective Federal Funds Rate 0.008441 75.2%
Private Equity[-1] 1.109000 100.0%
Employment (U.S.)[-1] 0.000190 93.4%
Employment (U.S.)[-2] -0.000202 99.9%
Private Equity[-4] -0.124300 100.0%
_AUTO[-12] 0.488200 100.0%
_AUTO[-10] -0.177700 99.8%
Notes
1Numbers in brackets represent lags, i.e. a [-1] indicates a one month lag of the given variable
2_AUTO[.] represents an autoregressive error of n lag; used for model fitting

 

Moving on to the second industry, investment banking, the results of the employment regressions are reported below.

The correlation between investment banking industry employment and the effective federal funds rate is much stronger, with an estimated coefficient of 0.36 and a confidence level of 89.8 percent.   So, the effect of the effective federal funds rate indicates that a 100 basis point increase in the effective federal funds rate is correlated with an increase in investment banking employment by 360 people.

Contrary to the private equity industry, the investment banking industry is also much more sensitive to the 10 year note yield, with an estimated coefficient of 0.904 and a confidence level of 99.9 percent.  What this says is that a 100 basis point increase in the yield on the 10 year Treasury is correlated with a 904 person increase in investment banking industry employment (again, after controlling for the effect of the overall economy, which generally pushes industry employment up independent of the 10 year note).

Investment Banking
Estimated Effect on Investment Banking Employment Confidence Level
Employment (U.S.) 0.000319 99.6%
Capital Gains Tax Rate -308.800000 99.8%
Ten year  Treasury 0.903600 99.9%
Effective Federal Funds Rate 0.357300 89.8%
Investment Banking (U.S.)[-1] 0.792900 100.0%
Investment Banking (U.S.)[-24] 0.214700 100.0%
Notes
1Numbers in brackets represent lags, i.e. a [-1] indicates a one month lag of the given variable

 

The results for the third group, the hedge fund industry, are reported below.

Overall, the results indicate a 99.9 percent confidence that the effective federal funds rate impacts hedge fund industry employment, with an estimated effect of 0.021.  The 0.021 means that a 100 basis point increase in the effective federal funds rate is correlated (again, controlling for other effects) with a 214 person increased in the industry.

The results on the 10 year Treasury are not as strong, with an estimated effect of -0.016 and a confidence level of 62.8 percent.  The negative coefficient indicates that as the yield on the 10 year goes up, it puts downward pressure on hedge fund industry employment.

Hedge Funds
Estimated Effect on Hedge Fund Employment Confidence Level
Employment (U.S.) 0.0000035 98.4%
Capital Gains Tax Rate -0.4090000 80.3%
Ten year  Treasury -0.0156900 62.8%
Effective Federal Funds Rate 0.0213900 99.9%
Hedge Fund (U.S.)[-1] 1.1900000 100.0%
Hedge Fund (U.S.)[-24] -0.2107000 99.9%
_AUTO[-12] -0.6436000 100.0%
_AUTO[-24] -0.3904000 100.0%
_AUTO[- 2] -0.1626000 99.7%
Notes
1Numbers in brackets represent lags, i.e. a [-1] indicates a one month lag of the given variable
2_AUTO[.] represents an autoregressive error of n lag; used for model fitting

 

The summarized results are reporting in the following table.

All Three Effects
Estimated Effect on Private Equity Employment Estimated Effect on Investment Banking Employment Estimated Effect on Hedge Fund Employment
Employment (U.S.) 0.0000170 0.0003190 0.0000035
Capital Gains Tax Rate -0.9071000 -308.8000000 -0.4090000
Ten year  Treasury 0.0044330 0.9036000 -0.0156900
Effective Federal Funds Rate 0.0084410 0.3573000 0.0213900
PE Confidence Level IB Confidence Level HF Confidence Level
Employment (U.S.) 23.3% 99.6% 98.4%
Capital Gains Tax Rate 95.0% 99.8% 80.3%
Ten year  Treasury 25.7% 99.9% 62.8%
Effective Federal Funds Rate 75.2% 89.8% 99.9%

 

As reported, the 10 year Treasury has the largest effect on the investment banking industry, which would, not surprisingly, explain why professionals in the industry tend to talk more about long term rates than do the other two.

On the effective federal funds target rate, the effect is also largest among the investment banking industry, with the hedge fund industry coming in second again.

Perhaps interestingly, of the three groups, the private equity industry is the least sensitive to interest rate movement.

Overall, the Federal Reserve’s new “Evans Rule” policy affects the financial industry by varying magnitudes, with the private equity industry probably least affected when compared to the investment banking industry and the hedge fund industry.

 

 

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post:

Real Time Web Analytics